The incidence of COVID-19 medical workers. The issues of biosafety and occupational risk factors

Relevance. During the pandemic of the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19), one of the most vulnerable and actively involved in the epidemic process categories of the population were medical workers. The study of the incidence of COVID-19 among medical workers, risk factors for infection and safety measures is an important area of research in modern conditions. The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence of COVID-19 among employees of medical organizations and occupational risk factors for infection in order to develop proposals for corrective measures. Materials and methods. To study the incidence of COVID-19 among employees of medical organizations, an anonymous online questionnaire developed by the authors was used, which was posted on the Google platform and distributed during the first wave of the pandemic among employees of medical organizations in several regions of the Russian Federation through corporate e-mail or specialized online resources adapted for health workers. The survey involved 1,872 medical workers of different genders, ages, positions and work experience. Results and discussion. Among the survey participants, 161 employees have already had a new coronavirus infection. In the majority (64.0%) of them, the disease occurred in the form of acute respiratory infection, in 28.6% - interstitial pneumonia, in 7.4% only the fact of isolation of the SARSCoV-2 antigen without clinical manifestations of infection was documented. The most affected contingents were secondary and junior medical personnel, mainly hospital staff. The likelihood of infection in the workplace was increased by factors such as providing care to patients with confirmed COVID-19, participating in procedures related to aerosol generation, working with biomaterials of patients with COVID-19, contact with surfaces in the environment of a COVID-19 patient, ignorance of infectious safety issues due to lack of instruction before admission to work. When assessing the efficiency of personal protective equipment (PPE) when they are used in the process, it was found that the highest value for the prevention of infection COVID-19 had a PPE for face protection, respiratory and eye, and hand hygiene. At the same time, many employees are faced with the problem of an insufficient number of protective equipment in the workplace. When assessing the availability of SARS-CoV-2 testing to employees, it was found that only 77.4% of survey participants had the opportunity to be tested for coronavirus infection in a timely manner. Conclusion. Thus, for more effective protection of employees of medical organizations, it is necessary to have a sufficient number of personal protective equipment, especially for the face, respiratory organs and vision, the availability of hygienic hand treatment during work, regular instruction on infectious safety, using interactive forms of training, and the organization of screening examinations of previously unvaccinated and unvaccinated employees.

1. Briko NI, Kagramanyan IN, Nikiforov VV, Suranova TG, et al. Pandemic COVID-19. Prevention Measures in the Russian Federation. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2020; 19 (2): (In Russ.). https://doi:10.31631/2073-3046-2020-19-2-4-12.

2. Shchelkanov M.Yu., Kolobukhina L.V., Burgasova O.A., Kruzhkova I.S., Maleev V.V. COVID-19: etiology, clinical picture, treatment // Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity = Infektsiya i immunitet, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 421–445. doi: 10.15789/2220-7619-CEC-1473

3. Alserehi НА, Alqunaibet АМ, Al-Tawfiq JA, et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia: comparing case and control hospitals. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2021;99(3):115–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115273

4. Chou R, Dana T, Buckley DI, et al. Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for Coronavirus Infection in Health Care Workers: A Living Rapid Review. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(2):120– 136. doi: 10.7326/M20-1632.

5. Kursumovich E, Lennane S, Cook T. Deaths in healthcare workers due to COVID-19: the need for robust data and analysis. Anaesthesia. 2020:75:989–992. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15116.

6. Wang X, Liu W, Zhao J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 80 hospitalized frontline medical workers infected with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2020;105(3):399–403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.019.

7. Calo F, Russo A, Camaioni C, et al. Burden, risk assessment, surveillance and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health workers: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00756-6.

8. Hughes MM, Groenewold MR, Lessem SE, et al. Update: Characteristics of Health Care Personnel with COVID-19 - United States, February 12-July 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(38):1364–1368. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6938a3.

9. Kambhampati AK, O’Halloran AC, Whitaker M., et al. COVID-19–Associated Hospitalizations Among Health Care Personnel – COVID-NET, 13 States, March 1–May 31, 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6943e3.htm?s_cid=mm6943e3_w.

10. Treibel TA, Manisty C, Burton M, et al. COVID-19: PCR screening of asymptomatic health-care workers at London hospital. Lancet. 2020;395(10237):1608–1610. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31100-4.

11. Hunter E, Price DA, Murphy E, et al. First experience of COVID-19 screening of health-care workers in England. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):e77–e78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30970-3.

12. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Joshi AD, et al. Risk of COVID-19 among frontline healthcare workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5:475–483. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.29.20084111

13. Shields A, Faustini SE, Perez-Toledo M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and asymptomatic viral carriage in healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study Thorax 2020;75:1089– 1094. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215414.