Meningococcal Infection in Novosibirsk: Changes in Epidemiology and Prevention Problems
https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2021-20-3-60-75
Abstract
Relevance. Meningococcal disease is a relatively rare but still potentially fatal and disabling infection, affecting primarily healthy people of all age groups, and remains an important public health problem.
Aims. The aim of the study was to analyze the long-term dynamics of the incidence of MI in the Novosibirsk region (NSO; identification and study of the factors that determined the change in the incidence of MI in 2019 in the region.
Materials & Methods. A retrospective comparative epidemiological analysis of the incidence of the population of the Novosibirsk region in 1992–2019 was carried out. using statistical reporting forms No. 2 «Information on infectious and parasitic diseases»; state reports «On the state of sanitary and epidemiological well-being ofthe population oftheRussian Federation» for 1998–2015, and according to the NSO for 2005–2019.
Results. An analysis of the epidemiological patterns of MI in the NSO revealed the presence of significant fluctuations in the incidence rates with multiple replacements of the leading strains of meningococcus, in the absence of immunity to all the main pathogens of MI in the vast majority of the region's inhabitants (from 60% to 82.92% of the population in different years remained seronegative to meningococcus serogroup A, 100% of the examined are seronegative to serogroup C). Simultaneously with the change in the epidemic situation in MI in the NSO in 2019, a tendency towards an increase in the incidence of MI was registered during 2016–2019 and in all regions ofCentral Asia, from where the influx oflabor migrants with their families continues. As anti-epidemic measures in risk groups, vaccination was used mainly against meningococcus serogroup A in combination with chemoprophylaxis in contact persons.
Conclusion. The NSO (Novosibirsk) is characterized by: dynamic changes in the circulating serogroups of meningococcus, the presence of refugees and migrants with a high risk of infection with local strains and the introduction of new ones, including hypervirulent strains from regions on the transit route; high risk of repeated outbreaks and further complication of the epidemic situation. It is necessary to form a regional vaccine prophylaxis program, taking into account the variability of the etiology of MI and the most effective prevention strategies.
About the Authors
I. Ya. IzvekovaRussian Federation
Irina Ya. Izvekova – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Novosibirsk
L. V. Samoilova
Russian Federation
Lada V. Samoilova
Novosibirsk
L. Yu. Chernyshova
Russian Federation
Lyudmila Yu. Chernyshova
Novosibirsk
O. A. Simkina
Russian Federation
Olga A. Simkina
Novosibirsk
T. Yu. Ivleva
Russian Federation
Tatyana Yu. Ivleva
Novosibirsk
E. I. Krasnova
Russian Federation
Elena I. Krasnova
Novosibirsk
U. A. Arkhipova
Russian Federation
Ulyana A. Arkhipova
Novosibirsk
References
1. Erickson LJ. Complications of meningococcal disease in college students. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(5):737–739. doi: 10.1086/322587.
2. Pace D, Pollard AJ. Meningococcal disease: clinical presentation and sequelae. Vaccine. 2012;30(Suppl 2):B3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.062.
3. Maiden MC, Jansen van Rensburg MJ, Bray JE, et al. MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics. Nat RevMicrobiol. 2013;11(10):728–736. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3093.
4. Acevedo R, Bai X, Borrow R, et al. The Global Meningococcal Initiative meeting on prevention of meningococcal disease worldwide: Epidemiology, surveillance, hypervirulent strains, antibiotic resistance and high-risk populations. Expert review of vaccines. 2019;18(1): 15–30. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1557520.
5. Caugant DA, Tzanakaki G, Kriz P. Lessons from meningococcal carriage studies. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007; 31:52–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1574–6976.2006.00052.x.
6. Christensen H, May M, Bowen L, et al. Meningococcal carriage by age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:853–61. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70251-6.
7. Trotter CL, Gay №, Edmunds WJ. The natural history of meningococcal carriage and disease. Epidemiol Infect. 2006; 134:556–66. doi: 10.1017/S0950268805005339.
8. Harrison LH, Shutt KA, Arnold KE, et al. Meningococcal carriage among Georgia and Maryland high school students. J Infect Dis. 2015; 211:1761–8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu679.
9. Jeppesen CA, Snape MD, Robinson H, et al. Meningococcal carriage in adolescents in the United Kingdom to inform timing of an adolescent vaccination strategy. J Infect. 2015; 71:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.02.006.
10. Mandal S, Wu HM, MacNeil JR, et al. Prolonged university outbreak of meningococcal disease associated with a serogroup B strain rarely seen in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 57:344–8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit243.
11. Beloborodov VB. Meningococcal disease. Infectious diseases. 2018;7(1):46–53 (In Russ.). doi:10.24411/2305-3496-2018-00006
12. Iser BP, Lima HC, de Moraes C, et al. Outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis C in workers at a large food-processing plant in Brazil: challenges of controlling disease spread to the larger community. Epidemiology and Infection. 2012;140(5):906–915. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811001610.
13. Burman C, Serra L, Nuttens C, et al. Meningococcal disease in adolescents and young adults: a review of the rationale for prevention through vaccination. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2018; 15:2,459–469. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1528831.
14. Sudbury E L., O’Sullivan S, Lister D, et al. Case Manifestations and Public Health Response for Outbreak of Meningococcal W Disease, Central Australia, 2017. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2020;26(7):1355–1363. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.181941.
15. Skoczynska A, Wasko I, Kuch A, et al. (2013) A Decade of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Surveillance in Poland. PLoS ONE. 8(8):e71943. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071943.
16. Nnadi C, Oladejo J, Yennan S, et al. Large Outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup C – Nigeria, December 2016–June 2017 MMWR. 2017;66(49);1352–6. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6649a3.
17. Yezli S, Bin Saeed AA, Assiri AM, et al. Prevention of meningococcal disease during the Hajj and Umrah mass gatherings: past and current measures and future prospects. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;47:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.12.010.
18. Memish ZA, Steffen R, White P. Mass gatherings medicine: public health issues arising from mass gathering religious and sporting events. Lancet. 2019; 393:2073–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30501-X.
19. World Health Organization. Public health for mass gatherings: key considerations. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/162109/WHO_HSE_GCR_2015.5_eng.pdf Accessed 2020 Sept 5/
20. Muttalif AR, Presa JV, Haridy H, et al. Incidence and Prevention of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Global Mass Gathering Events. Infect Dis Ther. 2019;8(4):569–579. doi: 10.1007/s40121-019-00262-9.
21. Dinleyici EC, Borrow R. Meningococcal infections among refugees and immigrants: silent threats of past, present and future/ Human Vaccines &Immunotherapeutics, 2020. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1744979.
22. Greenaway C, Castelli F. Infectious diseases at different stages of migration: an expert review. J Travel Med. 2019;26(2):taz007. doi:10.1093/jtm/taz007
23. Cañardo G, Gálvez J, Jiménez J, et al. Health status of rescued people by the NGO Open Arms in response to the refugee crisis in the Mediterranean Sea. Confl Health, 2020;14–21. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00275-z.
24. Izvekova IY, Krasnova EI. Epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease in Novosibirsk region during 1992–2015. Journal Infectology. 2016;8(3):99–106 (In Russ.).
25. Belyakov VD, Yafaev RH. Epidemiologiya. Moscow: Medicina; 1989 (In Russ).
26. Gosudarstvennye doklady «O sostoyanii sanitarnoepidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Novosibirskoj oblasti v 2005–2019 gg.» Upravlenie Federal’noj sluzhby po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebitelej i blagopoluchiya cheloveka po NSO (In Russ).
27. Nadel S, Ninis N. Invasive Meningococcal Disease in the Vaccine Era. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2018; 6:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00321
28. Briko NI, Onishchenko GG, Pokrovskij VI. Rukovodstvo po epidemiologii infekcionnyh boleznej. Medicinskoe informacionnoe agentstvo. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ).
29. Skripchenko NV, Vil›nic AA. Meningokokkovaya infekciya u detej. Sankt-Peterburg; 2015 (In Russ).
30. Bilukha OO, Rosenstein N. Prevention and control of meningococcal disease. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports. 2005;54(RR-7):1–21.
31. Burman C, Serra L, Nuttens C, et al. Meningococcal disease in adolescents and young adults: a review of the rationale for prevention through vaccination. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 2019;15:459–469. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1528831.
32. Sanitarno-epidemiologicheskie pravila SP 3.1.3542-18 «Profilaktika meningokokkovoj infekcii» ot 20.12.2018 (In Russ).
33. Gosudarstvennyj doklad «O sostoyanii sanitarnoepidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Novosibirskoj oblasti v 2019» (In. Russ).
34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Travel to mass gatherings. [Internet]. Available at: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2018/advising-travelers-withspecific-needs/travel-to-mass-gatherings Accessed 2020 Sept 5
35. Badahdah AM, Rashid H, Khatami A, et al. Meningococcal disease burden and transmission in crowded settings and mass gatherings other than Hajj/Umrah: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2018;36:4593–4602. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.027.
36. Kraeva LA, Tokarevich NK, Lavrent’eva IN. Inficirovannost› trudovyh migrantov iz Srednej Azii i postoyannyh zhitelej Sankt-Peterburga vozbuditelyami razlichnyh infekcionnyh zabolevanij i vospriimchivost› k nim. Infekciya i immunitet. 2018;8(1):61–70 (In Russ).
37. Bai X, Borrow R, Bukovski S, et al. Prevention and control of meningococcal disease: Updates from the Global Meningococcal Initiative in Eastern Europe. Journal of Infection. 2019;79:528–541. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.10.018.
38. Gosudarstvennyj doklad «O sostoyanii sanitarnoepidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2019» (In Russ).
39. Gricaj MI, Koroleva MA, Fomkina NN, et al. Epidemiologicheskaya harakteristika meningokokkovoj infekcii v Moskve. Epidemiologiya i Vakcinoprofilaktika. 2020;19(2): 56–62 (In Russ).
40. Kazahstan. Saudovskaya Araviya (In Russ). Available at: https://polpred.com/news/?cnt=135§or=7 . Accessed 2020 Sept 5.
41. Kazakhstan. TMoHotRo. Department of public policy health statistics. Available at: http://dsm.gov.kz/ru/kategorii/statistika-0theme_version=mirm. Accessed 2020 Sept 5.
42. Delovaya Saudovskaya Araviya. Available at: http://saudi.polpred.com/http://med.polpred.com/. Accessed 2020 Sept 5.
43. Mirtazaev OM, Matnazarova GS, Bryanceva EV, et al. Nekotorye epidemiologicheskie osobennosti meningokokkovoj infekcii v Uzbekistane (na primere goroda Tashkenta). Zurnal teoreticheskoj i klinicheskoj mediciny. 2020:117–122 (In Russ).
44. Health status and health care in Tajikistan. Epidemiology, Statistics and Health Information Unit, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1999; С23. http://www.who.dk.
45. Evropejskaya ekonomicheskaya komissiya OON. Obzory rezul›tativnosti ekologicheskoj deyatel›nosti. 2017;45:452 (In Russ).
46. Abdykerimova NA, Niyazalieva MS, Adymbekov DA, et al. Zabolevaemost› gnojnymi bakterial›nymi meningitami detej doshkol›nogo vozrasta v Kyrgyzskoj respublike. Voprosy pediatrii. 2016;4:41–44 (In Russ).
47. Dzholbunova ZK. Kliniko-epidemiologicheskaya harakteristika enterovirusnyh i meningokokkovyh meningitov. Vestnik KGMA im I.K. Ahunbaeva. 2011;4:6–9 (In Russ).
48. CDC. Guidance for the evaluation and public health management of suspected outbreaks of meningococcal disease. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/meningococcal/downloads/meningococcal-outbreak-guidance.pdf Accessed 2020 Sept 5.
49. McNamara LA, MacNeil JR. Mass chemoprophylaxis for control of outbreaks of meningococcal disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(9):е272–е281. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30124-5.
50. Bröker M, Veitch K. Quadrivalent meningococcal vaccines: Hyporesponsiveness as an important consideration when choosing between the use of co №ugate vaccine or polysaccharide vaccine. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2010;8(1):47–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.12.001.
51. Karami M, Doosti-Irani A, et al. Public Health Threats in Mass Gatherings: A Systematic Review. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13(5–6):1035–1046. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2018.161.
52. Sadarangani М, Pollard AJ. Can we control all-cause meningococcal disease in Europe? Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2016; 22: S103eS112. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.006.
53. Peterson ME, Li Y, Bita A. Meningococcal serogroups and surveillance: a systematic review and survey. J.of Global Health. 2019; 9(1):1–16. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010409.
54. Fridman IV, Harit SM. Profilaktika meningokokkovoj infekcii. Medicinskij sovet. 2017;4:16–18 (In Russ).
55. Taha M-K, Gaudelus J, et al. Recent changes of invasive meningococcal disease in France: arguments to revise the vaccination strategy in view of those of other countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1729030.
Review
For citations:
Izvekova I.Ya., Samoilova L.V., Chernyshova L.Yu., Simkina O.A., Ivleva T.Yu., Krasnova E.I., Arkhipova U.A. Meningococcal Infection in Novosibirsk: Changes in Epidemiology and Prevention Problems. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2021;20(3):60-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2021-20-3-60-75