Preview

Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention

Advanced search

Is the Existing Measles Vaccination Schedule in the Russian Federation Effective?

https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2025-24-2-4-13

Abstract

Relevance. During the period of long–term measles vaccination in Russia, the age of those who were vaccinated with live measles vaccine changed several times – from 9 to 15-18 months, until scientific research proved the optimal age of 12 months. During the period of measles elimination, when population immunity is formed mainly through immunization, and the artificial active immunity of mothers protects children of the first year of life for a shorter period of time than natural active immunity, the incidence of this infection in children under 1 year of age is of particular importance for managing the epidemic process of measles. The aim of this study is to assess the importance of measles in the epidemic process of children under the age of 1 year during the elimination of infection, the effectiveness of the current measles vaccination regimen.
Materials and methods. The measles incidence in children under 1 year of age was analyzed in absolute and relative terms for the period from 2010 to 2024. For more u For a more in-depth analysis, the years of the increase in the incidence of 2012, 2014, 2019, 2023 and 2024 were selected, when the patterns of involvement of this analyzed group in the epidemic process of measles were most pronounced. The Pearson coefficient was used to determine the correlation.
Results and discussions. The configuration of the measles incidence curve in children in the first year of life completely coincides with the dynamics of measles incidence in the general population, and a strong positive correlation (r=+0.99) confirmed the dependence of the incidence of the analyzed age group on the overall incidence. Further in-depth analysis showed that children under the age of 1 are not the leading group at high risk of infection, but rather passively participate in the epidemic process, becoming involved in the process with an increasing number of sources of infection. Thus, the proportion of sick children during the years of the rise in morbidity ranged from 7.77% to 15.87%, but even in the year of the maximum increase in the overall incidence, the but at the same time, even in the year of the maximum increase in the overall incidence recorded in 2024, when the total number of cases exceeded 22 thousand people, the analyzed indicator did not exceed 9.69%. Children aged 6-11 months were more likely to get sick, accounting for an average of 75.98%, while the proportion of children with measles in the first five months averaged 24.02%. The structure of measles cases was dominated by unvaccinated individuals. During the years of the rise in the incidence of 2012, 2014, 2019, 2023, 2024, the proportion of the unvaccinated accounted for respectively 77,0%, 75,2%, 84,4%, 88,8%, 89,5%. Among them, children of the first year of life accounted for a small percentage – only 20,6%, 14,9%, 9,4%, 8,7% and 10.7%.
Conclusion. The results of the analysis of the incidence of children under one year of age confirmed the validity of vaccination tactics at 12 months and at 6 years of age in our country. The incidence of measles in children under the age of vaccination directly depends on the vaccination against measles in their immediate environment, therefore it is very important to maintain population immunity at a level of at least 95.0%. At the moment, there is no reason to change the scheme, which does not exclude its change in the event of new vaccines or changes in the epidemic situation for measles.

About the Authors

O. V. Tsvirkun
G.N. Gabrichevsky research institute for epidemiology and microbiology; The People’s Friendship University of Russia (RUDN)
Russian Federation

Olga V. Tsvirkun – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Epidemiological Departmen; Associate Professor at the Chair of Infectious Diseases with Courses in Epidemiology and Phthisiology

Moscow



A. G. Gerasimova
G.N. Gabrichevsky research institute for epidemiology and microbiology
Russian Federation

Alexandra G. Gerasimova – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Leading researcher

Moscow



N. V. Turaeva
G.N. Gabrichevsky research institute for epidemiology and microbiology
Russian Federation

Natalya V. Turayeva – Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Moscow



N. T. Tikhonova
G.N. Gabrichevsky research institute for epidemiology and microbiology
Russian Federation

Nina T. Tikhonova – Dr. Sci. (Biol.), professor, chief researcher

Moscow



A. A. Melnikova
Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare
Russian Federation

Albina A. Melnikova – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Epidemiological Welfare of the Population

Moscow



A. A. Vatolina
Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare
Russian Federation

Anna A. Vatolina – Deputy Head of the Department of Epidemiological Surveillance of Infections Controlled by Immunoprophylaxis and Parasitic Diseases

Moscow



References

1. Bolotovsky V.M., Gelikman B.G., Titova N.S. Immunological efficacy of repeated vaccination against measles in children who remained seronegative after vaccination. . Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. - 1984. - No. 7. – pp.100–106 (In Russ.).

2. Bolotovsky V.M. Zagaryants A.I. Principles of building regional calendars of preventive vaccinations. VI All-Russian Congress of Microbiologists, epidemiologists and parasitologists: abstracts – M.- 1991. – pp.164–165 (In Russ.).

3. Rusakova E.B. Vaccine prevention of controlled infections and ways to optimize it : abstract of the dissertation. ...Doctor of Medical Sciences: 14.00.30, Moscow, 1993– 49 p. (In Russ.).

4. Ignatieva, G.V., Gerasimova A.G., Kuznetsova L.S., et al. Epidemiological surveillance of measles (results and immediate tasks). V All-Russian Congress of Microbiologists and Epidemiologists: abstracts reports– Moscow, 1985. pp.131–134 (In Russ.).

5. Ignatieva G.V., Gerasimova A.G., Tikhonova N.T., et al. Actual issues of measles infection at the present stage. Collection of scientific papers of the Moscow Institute of Medical Sciences «Acute infections».- M.- 1978.- volume XIX- pp.115–121 (In Russ.)..

6. Bolotovsky V.M., Gelikman B.G., Auzinya A.V., et al. Duration and intensity of post-vaccination anti-measles immunity. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 1990.No. 5. pp.32–37 (In Russ.).

7. Gamaleya N.F. Dialectics of infections (historical development of infections)/ N.F. Gamaleya //In the book of Collected Works, Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR, 1964, vol. 6, p. 41.45 (In Russ.).

8. Deshevoy S.E., Makarova N.T., Petrova V.N., et al. Patterns of the epidemic process. / L.: Leningrad Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology. Pasteur, 1983.–192s. (In Russ.).

9. Vaccination calendars from different countries. Available at: vaccina.info›vaccination-in-countries.

10. Measles vaccines: WHO position paper, April 2017 – Recommendations, Vaccine, 2019, 7 January; 37(2): 219–222. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28760612/

11. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization. WHO epidemiological data, 1/2021. Available at: www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/ vaccines-and-immunization/publications/surveillance-and-data/ who-epidata/epidata-12021

12. WHO. Global Immunization News – Technical information: The measles initiative vaccinates one Billion children in the first decade. Available at: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/defaultsource/immunization/gin/archives/gin_august_2011.pdf?sfvrsn=eb316e04_5 ( 21.11.2024)

13. ECDC. Measles and rubella elimination: communicating the importance of vaccination. Available at: www.ecdc.europa .eu/en/publications-data/measles-and-rubellaelimination-communicating-importance-vaccination (21.11.2024)/

14. Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization. WHO Epidemiological Report, 2021;1:1–9. Available at: www.euro.who.int WHO reference for 2020.


Review

For citations:


Tsvirkun O.V., Gerasimova A.G., Turaeva N.V., Tikhonova N.T., Melnikova A.A., Vatolina A.A. Is the Existing Measles Vaccination Schedule in the Russian Federation Effective? Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2025;24(2):4-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2025-24-2-4-13

Views: 1003


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-3046 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0494 (Online)