Preview

Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention

Advanced search

Comparative Randomized Study of Tolerability, Reactogenicity, Immunogenicity and Safety of the Vaccine «BiVac Polio» (Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Type 1,3)

https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2017-16-3-58-64

Abstract

Through the use of trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine made from Sabin strains of types 1, 2, 3 (tOPV), outstanding success of Global polio eradication program has been achieved. Since 1999, wild polio virus type 2 does not circulate in the world. To enhance immunity to poliovirus types 1 and 3, to reduce the risk associated with the continued use of tOPV (forming of vaccine-derived polioviruses and the emergence of cases of post-vaccination complications), the WHO proposed its replacement with bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) in programs of mass immunization. The results of clinical studies of tolerability, reactogenicity, safety and immunological effectiveness of the bOPV «BiVac Polio» developed in Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune-and Biological Products of Russian Academy of Sciences are presented. «BiVac Polio» is a preparation of Sabin strains of polio virus type 1 (strain LSc 2ab) and type 3 (strain Leon 12a1b). The content of infectious viral units per vaccination dose is not less than 106 0 TCD50 for poliovirus type 1 and not less than 1055 TCD50 for poliovirus type 3. As a preparation of comparison, trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine from Sabin strains types 1, 2, 3 was used. The study included two stages. Comparative assessment of tolerability, reactogenicity and safety of the vaccine «BiVac Polio» and tOPV was the purpose of the first stage which included 20 adults of both sexes. At the second phase of the study, a comparative investigation of tolerability, safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine«BiVac Polio» and tOPV in children aged 18 months and 6 months was carried out (each group consisted of 60 children). Estimation of vaccine immunogenicity was carried out using the level of seroconversion - rise of neutralizing antibody titers in the sera of recipients taken before and 28 days after vaccination. The titer of neutralizing antibodies in the blood serum to poliovirus type 1 and 3 was determined by microneutralization assay on HEp-2 cells. The results of clinical studies have shown that in their basic characteristics, «BiVac Polio» vaccine is not inferior to the preparation of comparison (tOPV) and may be used for prophylaxis of poliomyelitis.

About the Authors

Yu. H. Khapchaev
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products» of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


O. E. Ivanova
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products» of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


M. F. Vorovitch
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products» of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


V. V. Romanenko
Federal Budget Health Institution «Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology in the Sverdlovsk region»; Federal State Institution of Higher Education «Ural State Medical University» of Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation


A. E. Makarov
Federal State Institution of Higher Education «Ural State Medical University» of Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation


S. G. Drozdov
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products» of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


A. A. Ishmukhametov
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution «Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products» of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. World Health Assembly. Global Eradication of poliomyelitis by the year 2000. Resolution WHA 11.28. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1988.

2. Polio vaccines: WHO position paper – March, 2016. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec.; 2016, 91 (12): 145 – 168.

3. Sutter R.W., Kew O.M., Cochi S.L. Aylward R.B. Poliovirus vaccine-live. In: Plotkin S.A., Orenstein W.A., Offit P.A., eds. Vaccines, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier-Saunders; 2013: 598 – 645.

4. Lashkevich VA. History of development of the live poliomyelitis vaccine from Sabin attenuated strains in 1959 and idea of poliomyelitis eradication Voprosi Virusologii. [Problems of Virology]. 2013; 1: 4 – 10 (in Russian).

5. Chumakov M.P, Voroshilova M.K., Drozdov S.G., Dzagurov S.G., Lashkevich V.A., Mironova L.L. et al. Some results of the work on mass immunization of the population in the Soviet Union with live poliovirus vaccine from Albert B. Sabin′s strains. In: Oral live poliovirus vaccine. Papers presented at the IV-th Scientific conference of the Institute of Poiomyelitis and Virus Encephalitis and the International simposium on live poliovirus vaccine, May 17 – 20, 1960, Moscow. 1961: 19 – 32.

6. Available at: http://www.polioeradication.org/Polioandprevention/Thevaccines/Oralpoliovaccine%28OPV%29.aspx

7. WHO. Risk assessment: frequency and burden of VAPP, cVDPV and iVDPV. Report of the interim meeting of the Technical Consultative Group (TCG) on the Global Eradication of Poliomyelitis: Geneva, 13 − 14 November 2002. Geneva: WHO; 2002.

8. Strebel P.M., Sutter R.W., Cochi S.L., Biellik R.J., Brink E.W., Kew O.M. et al. Epidemiology of poliomyelitis in the United States one decade after the last reported case of indigenous wild virus-associated disease. Clin. Inf. Dis. 1992; 14 (2): 568 – 579.

9. Alexander L.N., Seward J.F., Santibanzes T.A., Pallansch M.A., Kew O.M, Prevots D.R. еt al. Vaccine policy changes and epidemiology of poliomyelitis in the United States. JAMA; 2004; 292 (14): 1696 – 1701.

10. Burns C.C., Diop O.M., Sutter R.W. Kew O.M. Vaccine-derived polioviruses. J Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 1;210 Suppl 1: S283-93.

11. Available at: http://www.polioeradication. org/Polioandprevention /Thevirus/Vaccinederivedpolioviruses.aspx.

12. Kew O.M., Sutter R.W., de Gourville E.M., Dowdle W.R., Pallansch M.A. Vaccine-derived polioviruses and the endgame strategy for global polio eradication. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2005; 59: 587 – 635

13. Available at: http://www.polioeradication.org/Portals/0/Document/Polioandprevention/CVDPVFactSheetMarch2015.pdf

14. WHO. Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on immunization, November 2012 – conclusions and recommendations. Wkly Epidemiol. Rec.; 2013; 88 (1): 1 – 16.

15. WHO. Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan 2013 − 2018. Available at: http://www.polioeradication.org/Portals/0/Document/Resources/StrategyWork/PEESP_EN_A4.pdf

16. Guidelines for conducting of clinical trials of medicinal products (Immunobiological drugs). Part two. Ed.; Mironov A.N. Moscow: Grif and K; 201: 212 (in Russian).

17. WHO. Manual for virological investigation of poliomyelitis. WHO/EPI/GEN/97.1. Geneva; 1997.

18. Estívariz C.F., Anand A., Gary H.E. Jr., Rahman M., Islam J., Bari T.I. et al. Immunogenicity of three doses of bivalent, trivalent, or type 1 monovalent oral poliovirus vaccines with a 2 week interval between doses in Bangladesh: an open- label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis.; 2015 Aug; 15 (8): 898 – 904.

19. Sutter R.W., John T.J., Jain H., Agarkhedkar S., Ramanan P.V., Verma H. et al. Immunogenicity of bivalent types 1 and 3 oral poliovirus vaccine: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet; 2010 Nov 13; 376 (9753): 1682 – 8.


Review

For citations:


Khapchaev Yu.H., Ivanova O.E., Vorovitch M.F., Romanenko V.V., Makarov A.E., Drozdov S.G., Ishmukhametov A.A. Comparative Randomized Study of Tolerability, Reactogenicity, Immunogenicity and Safety of the Vaccine «BiVac Polio» (Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Type 1,3). Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2017;16(3):58-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2017-16-3-58-64

Views: 1189


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-3046 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0494 (Online)