Preview

Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention

Advanced search

Three Levels of the Predicting of the Influenza Vaccine Strains

https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2019-18-2-4-17

Abstract

Relevance. The influenza vaccine can reduce the incidence and mortality from influenza if that are antigenically the same or related to the viruses. There are at least 3 levels of prediction: vaccine strains for the upcoming epidemic season; the trend of influenza viruses for 2–3 years ahead, the emergence of pre-pandemic virus strains. The aim of the work was to analyze the potential of bioinformatics to implement prediction at these 3 levels for subtypes H1N1 and H3N2. Materials and methods. For the computer analysis, the database of the hemagglutinin (HA) primary structures of the H1N1 and H3N2 strains isolated in the influenza epidemiological season 2016–2017 – 2018–2019 was used from the Internet. At the first prediction level, an adapted hidden Markov model was used, at the second, invariants were searched for НА H1N1 and its antigenic sites, and at the third level, prediction was based on identifying invariants in structural proteins of pandemic strains. Results. The circulation of several dominant strains in the epidemiological season 2018–2019 was predicted, the existence of invariants in НА Н1 and its antigenic sites НА H1N1 was shown, and it was concluded that the threat of an influenza pandemic caused by avian influenza viruses was unlikely. Conclusion The bioinformatics approach can be considered as a valuable tool in predicting, at different levels of circulation, certain strains of the influenza virus in the epidemic season.

About the Author

E. P. Kharchenko
I. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy Sciences.
Russian Federation

 Eugene P. Kharchenko – Dr. Sci. (Biol.), leader researcher.

194223, Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Toreza pr., 44. 



References

1. Klingen TR, Reimering S, Guzmán CA, et al. In silico vaccine strain prediction for human influenza viruses. Trends in Microbiology. 2018;26(2):119–131. doi: 10.1016/j. tim.2017.09.001

2. Morris DH, Gostic KM, Pompei S, et al. Predictive modeling of influenza shows the promise of applied evolutionary biology. Trends in Microbiology. 2018;26(2):102–118. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.004

3. Kharchenko EP. Optimization of the Predicting of the Influenza Vaccine Strains. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2019;18(1):4–17. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31631/2073-30462019-18-1-4-17

4. Rabiner LR. A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1989;77:257–286.

5. Urbakh VJ. Biometric methods. Moscow; 1964. (In Russ.)

6. Kharchenko EP. The invariant patterns of the internal proteins of pandemic influenza viruses. Infektsiya i immunitet [Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity]. 2015;5(4):323–330. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15789/2220-7619-2015-4-323-330

7. Estrada LD, Schultz-Cherry S. Development of a universal influenza vaccine. J Immunol. 2019;202:392–398. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801054

8. Morens DM, Taubenberger JK. Pandemic influenza: certain uncertainties. Rev Med Virol. 2011;21:262–284. doi: 10.1002/rmv.689

9. Hickman HD, Mays JW, Gibbs J, et al. Influenza A virus negative strand RNA is translated for CD8+ T cell immunosurveillance. J Immunol. 2018;201(4):1222–1228. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800586

10. Zhirnov OP, Poyarkov SV, Vorob’eva IV, et al. Segment NS of influenza A virus contains an additionaд gene NSP in positive-sense orientation. Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2007;414:127–133.

11. Herfst S, Schrauwen EJA, Linster M, et al. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science. 2012;336:1534–1541. doi: 10.1126/science.1213362

12. Imai M, Watanabe T, Hatta M, et al. Experimental adaptation of an influenza H5 haemagglutinin (HA) confers respiratory droplet transmission to a reassortant H5 HA/ H1N1 virus in ferrets. Nature. 2012;486(7403):420–428. doi: 10.1038/nature10831

13. Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS. Pandemic influenza viruses — hoping for the road not taken. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(25):2345–2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1307009

14. Cohen J. Universal flu vaccine is ‘an alchemist’s dream’. Science. 2018;362(6419):1094. doi: 10.1126/science.362.6419.1094

15. Chai N, Swem LR, Reichelt M, et al. Two escape mechanisms of influenza a virus to a broadly neutralizing stalk-binding antibody. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(6):e1005702. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005702

16. Prachanronarong KL, Canale AS, Liu P, et al. Mutations in influenza A virus neuraminidase and hemagglutinin confer resistance against a broadly neutralizing hemagglutinin stem antibody. J Virol. 2019;93(2):e01639–18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01639-18

17. Laursen NS, Friesen RHE, Zhu X, et al. Universal protection against influenza infection by a multidomain antibody to influenza hemagglutinin. Science. 2018;362(6414):598– 602. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0620

18. Kanekiyo M, Joyce MG, Gillespie RA, et al. Mosaic nanoparticle display of diverse influenza virus hemagglutinins elicits broad B cell responses. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(3):362– 372. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0305-x


Review

For citations:


Kharchenko E.P. Three Levels of the Predicting of the Influenza Vaccine Strains. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2019;18(2):4-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2019-18-2-4-17

Views: 1796


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-3046 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0494 (Online)