National Vaccination Shedule: Quality of Performance and Determining Factors
T. A. Platonova,
A. A. Golubkova,
E. S. Koltunova,
S. S. Smirnova,
V. V. Abdulvalieva,
O. A. Kuznezova https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2019-18-2-97-103
Abstract
Many issues concerning the organization of vaccination of the population in polyclinics still require improvement. The aim of the study is to assess the completeness and timeliness of vaccination of children in an outpatient setting and to identify factors affecting the adherence to vaccination of parents and medical staff. Materials and methods. The authors analyzed the history of child development and maps of preventive vaccinations of 631 children under 18 months of age to establish the completeness and timeliness of vaccinations against infections, approved by National immunization schedules. The authors analyzed the reasons for the lack of vaccinations and violations of the start and end of vaccination. To assess the population's attitude to vaccination, a survey of 865 parents and 1325 employees of medical organizations were conducted. In order to study the activity of discussion on the Internet issues related to vaccination, the number of records in the network on this topic and their content for 2007–2017 were analyzed. Results. The authors found that the coverage of children with vaccinations in the decreed age is insufficient and does not meet the requirements of National immunization schedules. The reasons for unvaccinated children in the maternity hospital were refusal of vaccination and medical contraindications (prematurity and low birth weight, respiratory failure, neonatal jaundice, HIV infection in the mother). In the clinic the leading causes of violation of the schedule of vaccination was temporary medical branches (the acute diseases), the late turnout at vaccination and refusals of immunization of parents. In assessing the attitude of parents to vaccination, the authors found that 79.3% of parents were positive, 6.4% – negative and 14.3% expressed doubts about the effectiveness and safety of vaccination. The main source of information was the opinion of health workers, among whom the survey revealed 187 people who are negative about vaccination. The opinion of relatives, friends and information received on the Internet were less authoritative. In assessing the monitoring data on the Internet, there was a significant increase in the number of people interested in and discussing the issues of vaccine prevention in social media, including their negative feedback. Conclusion. Authors recommend increasing the compliance of vaccine prophylaxis of medical workers, to form a positive attitude to vaccination among the population and to increase the coverage of vaccinations.
About the Authors
T. A. Platonova
Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation; Limited liability company «European medical centre «UMMC-Health».
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Platonova – post-graduate student of the Department of epidemiology, social hygiene and organization of sanitary-epidemiological service ; epidemiologist.
3 Repina st., Ekaterinburg 620028 ; 113 Sheinkmana st., Ekaterinburg 620144.
A. A. Golubkova
Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation; Federal budget institution of science «Ekaterinburg research institute of viral infections» of the Russian Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alla A. Golubkova – Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, professor of the department of epidemiology, social hygiene and organization of sanitary-epidemiological service; worker of the Ural-Siberian scientific-methodological center for the prevention of HCAI .
3 Repina st., Ekaterinburg 620028; 23 Letnyaya st., Ekaterinburg 620030.
E. S. Koltunova
Municipal Autonomous institution Children's city clinical hospital № 11.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Koltunova – epidemiologist of Municipal Autonomous institution Children’s city clinical hospital № 11.
48 Nagornaya st., Ekaterinburg 620028 .
S. S. Smirnova
Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation; Federal budget institution of science «Ekaterinburg research institute of viral infections» of the Russian Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana S. Smirnova – Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor of the Department of epidemiology, social hygiene and organization of sanitary-epidemiological service ; head of the Ural-Siberian scientific-methodological center for the prevention of HCAI.
3 Repina st., Ekaterinburg 620028; 23 Letnyaya st., Ekaterinburg 620030.
V. V. Abdulvalieva
Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Veronica V. Abdulvalieva – resident physician of the Department of epidemiology, social hygiene and organization of sanitary-epidemiological service .
3 Repina st., Ekaterinburg 620028.
O. A. Kuznezova
Federal State Budgetary Institution «Urals Scientific Research Institute for Maternal and Child Care» of Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Kuznetsova – epidemiologist.
1 Repina st., Ekaterinburg 620028.
References
1. Briko NI. Evaluation of the quality and effectiveness of immunoprophylaxis. Medical scientific and methodological portal «Attending physician». Available at: https://www. lvrach.ru/2012/10/15435557/ Accessed: 29 Jul 2018. (In Russ.)
2. Briko NI, Feldblyum IV, Mikheeva IV, et al. Vaccination: study guide with simulation course. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. (In Russ.)
3. Medunitsyn NV. Vaccinology. Moscow: Triada-X; 2004. (In Russ.)
4. Tatochenko VK, Ozeretskovsky NA, Fedorov AM. Immunoprophylaxis – 2014 (Handbook). Moscow: Pediatrician; 2014. (In Russ.)
5. Feldblyum IV. Epidemiological surveillance of vaccine. Medial. 2014;3(13)37–55. (In Russ.)
6. Feldblyum IV. Modern problems of vaccine prophylaxis (scientific review). Prophylactic and clinical medicine. 2017;2(63):20–27. (In Russ.)
7. Romanenko VV. Immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases in the health management system of the children’s population of the subject of the Russian Federation: Dissertation of the doctor of medical Sciences. Ekaterinburg; 2012. (In Russ.)
8. Tsvirkun OV. The epidemic process of measles in different periods of vaccination: Doctorate of med. sci. diss. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)
9. Golubkova AA, Platonova TA, Kharitonov AN, et al. Measles. Characteristics of the epidemic process and its determinants in real time (on the example of measles outbreak in Yekaterinburg in 2016). Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2017;6(97):54–58. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Platonova T.A., Golubkova A.A., Koltunova E.S., Smirnova S.S., Abdulvalieva V.V., Kuznezova O.A. National Vaccination Shedule: Quality of Performance and Determining Factors. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2019;18(2):97-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2019-18-2-97-103
Views:
1543
Email this article 