Preview

Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention

Advanced search

Epidemiological Analysis of Outcomes of Small Obstetric Operations

https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2020-19-4-91-96

Abstract

Relevance Тhe Priorities in the field of the state demographic policy of our country are to improve the reproductive health of the population, improve the system of obstetric care and the quality of medical care. An urgent problem is the quality of life of women in the postpartum period after injuries of the soft tissues of the birth canal and the use of obstetric in natural delivery (episiotomy, vacuum extraction of the fetus, the imposition of obstetric forceps, manual placental separation and manual examination of the uterine cavity). High rates of non-communicable complications confirm the need for further study of long-term effects and ways to improve the quality of care for women in the postpartum period. There is insufficient information on the dynamics of health indicators in the postpartum period, on the relationship of violations with various socio-hygienic, behavioral, medical and organizational factors acting in relation to the woman in this period. Obstetric operations and soft tissue injuries of the birth canal are also a risk factor for the development of purulent-septic infections in the postpartum period. For a comprehensive analysis of the factors determining reproductive behavior in women during rehabilitation, it is necessary to assess the effectiveness of measures in the postpartum period, the risks of long-term consequences for women after small obstetric operations. Aims. Summarize the available literary data and present modern views on the problem of the quality of life of women in the postpartum period after obstetric operations with natural delivery. Materials and methods. Analysis of publications on the quality of life in the postpartum period in the databases PUBMED, E-Library, Google Scholar, etc. from 2013 to 2019. The study includes sources in Russian and English, containing information on the frequency of various obstetric benefits for natural delivery, infectious and non-infectious complications after their implementation. Results. Birth canal Injuries (ruptures of the cervix, vaginal walls, perineum and vulva) account for up to 40% of cases [1,2]. Noted that in nulliparous they occur in 73%, while the performance of obstetric benefits (episiotomy, forceps, vacuum extraction) reach 90%. The frequency of perineal ruptures of the III degree ranges from 0.4 to 5% [3]. The frequency of ruptures of the perineum I-II degree does not have an official form of accounting and registration, also refers to injuries of the birth canal. According to official statistics, the frequency of application of vacuum extraction of the fetus in the European countries ranges from 2.8% to 16.7% of the total number of births, and in our country according to the Department of monitoring, analysis and strategic development of health, Ministry of health of the Russian Federation, the frequency of execution of vacumm extraction of the fetus and the imposition of obstetric forceps is the 11.04 and 0.56 per 1000 births. The number of women who have had these situations in childbirth is very high. At this stage, epidemiological monitoring of the postpartum period of women is reduced to monitoring infections in the field of surgery and predictors of the development of the infectious process. However, given the multifactorial nature of the problem, monitoring the quality of life in the postpartum period after these operations remains without due attention. First of all, they note negative changes after obstetric operations, such as a feeling of pain when walking, sitting, lifting weights. Unpleasant sensations in the sutures remain in the postpartum period for 2–3 weeks after discharge. After 3–4 weeks, the feeling of pain is replaced by itching and burning, which also gives discomfort to the woman. The situation is complicated by the lack of women's psychological support in this matter from the doctor. Many patients are afraid to address and ask questions about personal feelings and sexual life at the reception. Sexual dysfunction may be formed after performing obstetric benefits or injuries to the soft tissues of the birth canal, actually should be regarded as maternal morbidity. The introduction of epidemiological surveillance of the psychophysiological state of women after small obstetric operations will allow timely work with patients about the features of the postpartum period, to increase the percentage of satisfaction with the quality of services provided in obstetric institutions. The study of risk factors for the development of non-infectious diseases in women after childbirth allows us to calculate the degree of effectiveness of the planned medical and social measures for the prevention of negative consequences. Conclusions: The Development and implementation of epidemiological surveillance of women who have received obstetric benefits or had soft tissue injuries of the birth canal will allow to form an understanding of the rules and tactics of postpartum management, as well as to improve the quality of life of women during rehabilitation.

About the Authors

I. V. Taranenko
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov; Maternity hospital in Vyborg
Russian Federation

rina V. Taranenko  – postgraduate student of the Department of Epidemiology, Parasitology and Disinfection 

+7 (921)-927-83-52



A. V. Lubimova
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

nna V. Lyubimova  – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Department Epidemiology, Parasitology and Disinfectology 

+7 (906)-244-83-22



References

1. Glebova NN, Trubin VN, Latypov AS. Omission and loss of internal genitalia of women. Ufa. 1997:117 (In Russ.).

2. Kulakov VI, Chernukha EA, Gus AI, et al. Assessment of the state of the pelvic floor after childbirth through the natural birth canal. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2004;4:26–30 (In Russ.).

3. Kulakov VI, Butova EA. Obstetric trauma of the soft birth canal. 2003:4–9 (In Russ.).

4. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Birth rate: final data for 2013. National Reports On Vital Statistics. 2015; 64(1):1–65.

5. Aguiar M, Farley A, Hope L, Amin A, et al. Birth trauma of the perineum in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2019 Aug;23 (8):1048–1070

6. Main indicators of maternal and child health, activities of the child protection and maternity services in the Russian Federation. Moscow: Ministry of health of Russia. 2018;83–107 (In Russ.).

7. Yakovleva TV. Septic complications in obstetrics Clinical recommendations (treatment Protocol) (approved by the society of obstetric anesthesiologists and resuscitators and the Russian society of obstetricians and gynecologists on January 9, 10, 2017). Available at: http://rd1.medgis.ru/uploads/userfiles/shared/StandartMed/Protokolacusher/12.pdf the Link is active as of July 9, 2019 (In Russ.).

8. State report «On the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in 2018». Moscow: Federal service for supervision of consumer rights protection and human welfare. 2019:254 (In Russ.).

9. Jones K, Webb S, Manresa M, Hodgetts-Morton V, Morris RK. The incidence of wound infection and dehiscence following childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun 1;240:1–8.

10. Axelsson D, Brynhildsen J, Blomberg M. Postpartum infection due to maternal characteristics, obstetric interventions and complications. J Perinat Med. 2018 Apr 25;46(3):271–278.

11. Gommesen D, Nohr EA, Drue HC, et al. Obstetric perineal tears: risk factors, wound infection, and divergence: a prospective cohort study. Arches оf Gynecology is in Many Ways. 2019 July; 300(1):67–77.

12. Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective and routine use of episiotomy in vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 8;2:CD000081

13. Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, Howarth L, Goyder K, Van de Venne M, Murphy DJ. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1688–94.

14. Gyun I., Dogan B., Ozdamar O. Long-term and short-term complications of episiotomy / / Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2016;13(3):144. DOI: 10.4274/tjod.00087.

15. Baumann P, Hammoud AO, McNeeley SG, et al. Factors associated with anal sphincter rupture in 40,923 first-time mothers. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 2007;18:985–90.

16. Ayers S., Bond R., Bertalli S., Weima K. Etiology of posttraumatic stress after childbirth: meta-analysis and theoretical foundations. Psychol Med. 2016 Apr; 46 (6):1121–34.

17. Ganaba R, Marshall T, Sombié I, Baggaley RF, Ouédraogo TW, Filippi V. women’s sexual health and contraceptive needs after a severe obstetric complication («near miss»): a cohort study in Burkina Faso. The F Health. 2010;7: 22.

18. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2011;26(2):191–208.

19. Fischman SH, Rankin EA, Soeken KL, Lenz ER. Changes in sexual relationships in postpartum couples. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1986;15(1):58–63

20. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, et al. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(3):164–8.

21. Bonet M, Ota E, Chibueze CE, Oladapo OT. Antibiotic prophylaxis for episiotomy repair following vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 11. CD012136. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012136.pub2

22. Gaidukov SN. Obstetric benefits and operations. Phantom course: tutorial. St. Petersburg Кулаков В. И., Чернуха Е. А., Гус А. И. и др.: St. Petersburg. 2016:103 (In Russ.).

23. Provision of medical care for singleton births in the occipital presentation (without complications) and in the postpartum period. Clinical guidelines (protocol), approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation on May 27, 2014 No. 15-4/10/2-3185. M. 2014; 27. Available at: https://prof.ncagp.ru/upload/files/conf/rody_zad_2014.pdf Link active as of 09 July 2019 (In Russ.).

24. Djaković I, Ejubović E, van Bolanča I, et al. Third and Fourth Degree Perineal Tear in Four-Year Period at Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia. //Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences. 2018;6(6):1067.


Review

For citations:


Taranenko I.V., Lubimova A.V. Epidemiological Analysis of Outcomes of Small Obstetric Operations. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2020;19(4):91-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2020-19-4-91-96

Views: 1365


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-3046 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0494 (Online)