Predictive Capabilities of the Logistic Regression Method for Personalized Screening of Attitudes towards Vaccination
https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2026-26-2-49-59
Abstract
Relevance: Vaccination is an effective method of prevention for many infectious and non-infectious diseases. However, distrust in immunization has become a global public health challenge. Personalized tools for assessing attitudes toward vaccination are necessary to improve population adherence to vaccination programs.
Aims. To develop a binary logistic regression model for personalized assessment of an individual's attitude toward immunization.
Materials and methods. The study utilized results from an anonymous survey of 3,082 respondents (2,087 medical students and 995 non-medical students). The data were split into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) datasets. A binary logistic regression model was constructed based on responses to seven survey questions. Model evaluation was performed using ROC analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the F1-score.
Results. The developed model is statistically significant (p < 0.001) and explains 50.1 % of the variance in attitudes toward vaccination. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.888, indicating high discriminative ability. On the test dataset, the model demonstrated a sensitivity of 82.3 %, specificity of 86.7 %, and accuracy of 83.3 %.
Conclusion. The developed binary classifier exhibits high predictive capability for personalized assessment of an individual's attitude toward immunization. Its application can enable healthcare professionals to effectively identify individuals with uncertain or negative attitudes toward vaccination and conduct targeted educational interventions to improve vaccination adherence. To enhance the model's universality and accuracy, further training incorporating representatives of various social groups is required.
About the Authors
A. S. NechitayloRussian Federation
Alexandr S. Nechitaylo, Assistant, Department of Epidemiology, Social Hygiene and Organization of State Sanitary and Epidemiological Service
3 Repina st, Ekaterinburg, 620028
A. A. Kosova
Russian Federation
Anna A. Kosova – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Epidemiology, Social Hygiene, and Organization of the State Sanitary and Epidemiological Service
Ekaterinburg
E. S. Bashkirova
Russian Federation
Elena S. Bashkirova – Assistant of the Department of Epidemiology, Social Hygiene, and Organization of the State Sanitary and Epidemiological Service
Ekaterinburg
P. L. Shulev
Russian Federation
Pavel L. Shulev – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Epidemiology, Social Hygiene, and Organization of the State Sanitary and Epidemiological Service
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Mukozheva RA, Kulichenko TV, Vil'chanskaya TV, et al. Analysis of vaccination coverage and timeliness among children against infections included in the national immunization schedule in the Volga and Far Eastern federal districts of the Russian Federation: a cross-sectional study. Voprosy Sovremennoi Pediatrii. 2021;20(4):282–291. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v20i4.2284 (In Russ.)
2. Ushakova AA, Korneev AG, Pankov AS, et al.. On the effectiveness and safety of vaccination against the new coronavirus infection: a literature review. Orenburgskiy Meditsinskiy Vestnik (Orenburg Medical Bulletin). 2022;10(4[40]):6–11. EDN: ZVMLBR. (In Russ.)
3. Briko NI, Lobzin YuV, Baranov AA, et al. Assessment of vaccination effectiveness: main approaches and controversial issues. Pediatricheskaya Farmakologiya. 2014;11(4):8– 15. (In Russ.)
4. Su SB, Chang HL, Chen AK. Current status of mumps virus infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and vaccine. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051686
5. Robert A, Kucharski AJ, Funk S. The impact of local vaccine coverage and recent incidence on measles transmission in France between 2009 and 2018. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02277-5
6. Khan R, Ahmed A, Zeitounie R, et al. Impact of influenza vaccine in reduction of incidence and severity of influenza-like illness. East Mediterr Health J. 2021;27(9):884–891. doi: 10.26719/emhj.21.041
7. Pasechnik OA, Plekhanova MA, Tsygankova EA, et al. Effectiveness and safety of anti-tuberculosis vaccination. Epidemiology & Vakcinal Prevention. 2014;6(79):83–89. (In Russ.)
8. Yushkova IYu, Kostinov MP, Filatova IN, et al. Efficiency of vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae infection in children in closed institutions. Detskie Infektsii. 2004;4:34– 36. (In Russ.)
9. Romanenko VV, Kosova AA, Smirnova SS, et al. Organization of the immunoprophylaxis system of infectious diseases in the Sverdlovsk region: textbook. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Medical University; 2023. 173 p. ISBN: 978-5-00168-053-6. (In Russ.)
10. World Health Organization. Ten threats to global health in 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019. Accessed: February 18, 2024.
11. World Health Organization. Immunization Agenda 2030: a global strategy to leave no one behind. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/immunizationagenda-2030-a-global-strategy-to-leave-no-one-behind. Accessed: February 18, 2024.
12. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2390-r of September 18, 2020. On approval of the Strategy for the development of immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases for the period up to 2035. (In Russ.)
13. Larson HJ, de Figueiredo A, Xiahong Z, et al. The state of vaccine confidence 2016: global insights through a 67-country survey. EBioMedicine. 2016;12:295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.042
14. Briko NI. Tactics of forming adherence to vaccination. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2020. 168 p. (In Russ.)
15. Briko NI, Feldblyum IV, Alyeva MKh, et al. The concept of risk communication to ensure adherence to vaccination as a necessary component of the strategic development of immunoprophylaxis in Russia. Okhrana Zdorov’ya. 2021;(1). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptsiya-risk-kommunikatsiy-po-obespecheniyu-priverzhennosti-k-vaktsinatsii-kak-neobhodimaya-sostavlyayuschaya-strategicheskogo. (In Russ.)
16. Gavrikov PG, Kosova AA. Experience of using the VOSviewer software in epidemiological studies on the example of analysis of scientific publications in medical text databases. Vestnik Uralskogo Gosudarstvennogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta. 2020;(3):51–53. (In Russ.)
17. Certificate of State Registration of Database No. 2024624660, Russian Federation. Database for monitoring attitudes towards vaccination among students of medical and non-medical higher educational institutions: No. 2024623169; applied July 24, 2024; published October 23, 2024. (In Russ.)
18. Demsar J, Curk T, Erjavec A, et al. Orange: data mining toolbox in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2013;14:2349–2353.
19. Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med. 2013;4(2):627–635.
20. Obuchowski NA, Bullen JA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves: review of methods with applications in diagnostic medicine. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(7):07TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab4b1
21. Sergienko VI, Bondareva IB. Mathematical statistics in clinical research. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2006. (In Russ.)
22. Bogdanov LYu. Evaluation of the effectiveness of binary classifiers based on logistic regression using ROC analysis. Vestnik Saratovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta. 2010;4(2[50]):92–97. (In Russ.)
23. Starovoitov VV, Golub YuI. Comparative analysis of binary classification quality estimates. Informatika. 2020;17(1):87–101. doi: 10.37661/1816-0301-2020-17-1-87-101. (In Russ.)
24. Gaidyshev IP. Evaluation of the quality of binary classifiers. Vestnik Omskogo Universiteta. 2016;1(79):14–17. (In Russ.)
25. Kovalev AA, Kuznetsov BK, Yadchenko AA, et al. Evaluation of the quality of a binary classifier in scientific research. Problemy Zdorov’ya i Ekologii. 2020;4:105–113. doi: 10.51523/2708-6011.2020-17-4-15. (In Russ.)
26. Narkevich AN, Vinogradov KA. Methods for determining the minimally required sample size in medical research. Sotsial’nye Aspekty Zdorov’ya Naseleniya. 2019;65(6):10. doi: 10.21045/2071-5021-2019-65-6-10. (In Russ.)
27. Certificate of State Registration of Computer Program No. 2024669673, Russian Federation. Classifier of the mode of an individual's attitude to immunoprophylaxis "ImmuMind" / A.S. Nechitaylo, A.A. Kosova., V.I. Chalapa. [et al.] - Right Holder: Ural State Medical University No. 2024667325; applied July 25, 2024; published August 20, 2024. (In Russ.)
28. Plakida AV, Briko NI, Namazova-Baranova LS, et al. Increasing population adherence to vaccination: assessment and systematic approach to implementation. Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2022;21(3):4–26. doi: 10.31631/2073-3046-2022-21-3-4-26. (In Russ.)
29. Minaeva VA, Golubkova AA. The current state of vaccination and its resource support in the post-pandemic period: a scientific review. Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. 2024;29(6):432–443. doi: 10.17816/EID636229. (In Russ.)
30. Minaeva VA, Golubkova AA. Delayed vaccination—missed opportunities for protection against childhood infections at an early age. Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. Current Issues. 2025;15(2):44–49. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Nechitaylo A.S., Kosova A.A., Bashkirova E.S., Shulev P.L. Predictive Capabilities of the Logistic Regression Method for Personalized Screening of Attitudes towards Vaccination. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2026;25(2):49-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2026-26-2-49-59
JATS XML






























