The Experience of the Retrospective Epidemiological Analysis of Outbreaks of Pertussis in the Moscow Suburbs

Background Pertussis outbreaks are continuously observed in different countries despite many years of specific prophylaxis measures for this infection, use of whole-cell and acellular vaccines and use of different schemes of immunization. In our country, even with the overall morbidity stabilization, outbreaks of pertussis continue to be recorded even in regions where the situation was satisfactory previously. As a rule, the majority of epidemic pertussis foci were limited to 1 case of disease (without spread of infection) -86.4% in average. The prevalence of mild clinical forms of disease that are hard to detect, poor effectiveness of the bacteriological method used for examination of exposed persons, and a decrease in the number of examined persons suggest underreporting of whooping cough cases. The most reliable information on the epidemic process manifestations of pertussis can be obtained during outbreaks. Therefore, we conducted a review of outbreaks of pertussis in a small town of district subordinance. Materials and methods As methods of our study we used retrospective epidemiological analysis, serological and molecular genetic methods. The main sources of information were emergency reports and epidemiological investigation of pertussis. Results and discussion From July 28, 2015 to March 24, 2016 year 58 cases of pertussis were observed. Three secondary schools, two grammar schools, five kindergartens, one trade school and the children not attending any educational facility were affected by the outbreak of whooping cough. In the end, during the outbreak, there were 6 foci in kindergartens, 1 focus in the trade school, 18 -in secondary schools, 53 household foci, with the number of patients ranging from 1 to 18. Age distribution was as follows: 50 children (86.2%), 6 adolescents (10.3%) and 2 (3.5%) adults. Among those, 9 people have not been vaccinated against pertussis, with three more also considered un-vaccinated due to an unknown vaccination status, and three children received just one dose of the DPT vaccine; 43 patients had been vaccinated against pertussis, including one who received three doses of the vaccine, 41 had a booster pertussis vaccination. In most cases the source of infection could not be established. 44 patients had a mild form of whooping cough, while 1 case was a combination of pertussis and parapertussis, and 13 patients had medium or severe form of the disease. Conclusion The almost simultaneous identification of whooping cough cases by a number of institutions suggest the existence hidden pertussis cases. Despite the fact that vaccination in household foci is not indicted, it is still possible to prevent the spread of pertussis. It was enough to suspect whooping cough in children coughing for more than 7 days and order laboratory examination to avoid any prolonged stay of an infection source in an organized collective. Overcrowded accommodation in neighbourhoods, close contacts of children at neighborhood playgrounds in neighborhoods and supplementary education classes were the factors that allowed the infection to spread to many institutions of the city.

вспышка, кашляющие дети, коклюш, очаг, outbreaks, coughing children, pertussis, hearth

1. Public Health England, Whooping cough (pertussis) statistics. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whooping-cough-pertussis-statistics.

2. Jackson D.W., Rohani P. Perplexities of pertussis: recent global epidemiological trends and their potential causes. Epidemiol Infect. 2013; 142: 1 – 13.

3. CDC Pertussis (Whooping Cough) Surveillance & Reporting. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/surv-reporting.html.

4. Bart M. J., Harris S.R., Advani A., Arakawa Y., Bottero D., Bouchez V. et al. Global population structure and evolution of Bordetella pertussis and their relationship with vaccination. mBio. 2014; 5:1074 – 1014.

5. Gay N.J., Miller E. Pertussis transmission in England and Wales. The Lancet. 2000; 355 (9214):1553.

6. Benjamin M. Althouse, Samuel V. Scarpino. Asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis. BMC Medicine. 2015; 13 (1) Available at: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-015-0382-8.

7. Plotkin S.A. The pertussis problem. Clin. Infec.t Dis. 2014; 58 (6): 830 – 833.

8. Public Health England, Whooping cough (pertussis) statistics. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whooping-cough-pertussis-statistics.

9. Kretzschmar M., Teunis P.F., Pebody R. G. Incidence and reproduction numbers of pertussis: estimates from serological and social contact data in five European countries. PLoS Med. 2010; (7): 1 – 10. Available at: http://paperity.org/p/61765532/incidence-and-reproduction-numbers-of-pertussis-estimatesfrom-serological-and-social.

10. CDC. Pertussis Epidemic – Washington, 2012. MMWR. 2012; 61 (28): 517 – 522.

11. Matthias J., Dusek C., Pritchard P.S., Rutledge L., Kinchen P., Lander M. Notes from the field: Outbreak of pertussis in a school and religious community averse to health care and vaccinations – Columbia County, Florida, 2013. MMWR. 2014; 63 (30): 655.

12. CDC. Outbreaks of Respiratory Illness Mistakenly Attributed to Pertussis — New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Tennessee, 2004 – 2006. MMWR. 2007; 56 (33) : 837–842.

13. CDC. Pertussis outbreak in an Amish community – Kent County, Delaware, September 2004–February 2005. MMWR. 2006; 55 (30): 817 – 821.

14. CDC. Use of mass Tdap vaccination to control an outbreak of pertussis in a high school–Cook County, Illinois, September 2006-January 2007. MMWR. 2008; 57 (29): 796 – 799.

15. Egorova T.V., Kulik M.S., Shangina I.A., Rozhkova A.V., Kassikhina S.A. Pertussis: an old problem in modern conditions. Vyatsky medicinsky byulleten’ [Vyatsky Medical Bulletin]. 2015; 2 (46): 44 – 47 (in Russian).

16. Nikolaeva I.V., Tsaregorodtsev A.D. Pertussis: current issues of epidemiology, diagnosis and prevention. The Russian herald of perinatology and pediatrics. 2015; T. 60. (5): 162 – 167 (in Russian).

17. Maksimenkova V.S. Analysis of the diagnosis of whooping cough in children at the prehospital stage and in the admission department based on the profile department of the CSTO No.2 in Voronezh. In the collection: The main problems in modern medicine Collection of scientific papers on the results of the international scientific and practical conference. Volgograd; 2016: 127 – 129 (in Russian).

18. Babachenko I.V. Clinical-epidemiological and microbiological evolution of whooping cough. Zhurnal infektologii. [Journal Infectology] 2009; 1 (2 – 3): 52 – 57 (in Russian).

19. Borisov A.S., Tsukanova E.S., Gurovich O.V., Pukhova E.V., Stepanischeva N.A., Meshkova Yu.V. et al. Pertussis and paracottus in the modern practice of the district pediatrician. Vestnik nauchnih konferencij [Bulletin of scientific conferences]. 2017; 1 – 1 (17): 34 – 36 (in Russian).

20. Gracheva N.M., Devyatkin A.V., Petrova M.S., Borisova O.Yu., Skirda T.A., Novikova L.I. and others. Pertussis (clinic, diagnosis, treatment). Poliklinika. [Polyclinic]. 2016; 2 – 1: 13 – 25 (in Russian).

21. Prevention of whooping cough: Sanitary rules and regulations: 3.1.2.3162-14: approved by the decree of the Chief State Sanitary. Physician of the Russian Federation at 17.03.2014 № 9.. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/499084787

22. Portal of continuing education. Available at: http://edu.rosminzdrav.ru.