Preview

Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention

Advanced search

The results of an Open, Randomized Comparative Clinical Study to Assess the Reactogenicity, Safety and Immunogenicity of the Vaccine EntseVir in Children Aged 3 to 17 Years

https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2015-14-2-66-72

Abstract

In 2011 - 2012 years in the Institute of childhood infections followed by an open comparative randomized study of tick-borne encephalitis vaccine EntseVir («Microgen») at a dose of 0.25 ml of the two schemes, planned and emergency in children aged 3 - 17 years. As a reference drug used vaccine FSME-Immun junior production (Baxter, AG, Austria). The results of clinical studies have shown that Entsevir at a dose of 0.25 ml has a good safety profile, low reactogenicity. Mostly recorded transient local reactions such as pain at the injection site weak degree. Severe reactions and post-vaccination complications were absent. EntseVir has no immunosuppressive, immunopathological action, highly immunogenic and can be recommended for mass prophylaxis tick-borne encephalitis in children 3 - 17 years on two schemes of vaccination (planned with an interval of 60 days and emergency with an interval of 14 days).

About the Authors

S. M. Kharit
Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections
Russian Federation


A. A. Ruleva
Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections
Russian Federation


I. V. Fridman
Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections
Russian Federation


E. P. Nacharova
Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections
Russian Federation


L. A. Alekseeva
Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections
Russian Federation


G. A. Vasil'eva
Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections
Russian Federation


A. A. Vilnic
Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections
Russian Federation


M. V. Ivanova
Scientific Research Institute of Children’s Infections
Russian Federation


References

1. Zlobin V.I. Tick-borne encephalitis in the Russian Federation: the current state of the problem and strategies for prevention. Problems of Virology. 2005; 3: 32 – 36 (in Russian)..

2. Jerusalimsky A.P. Tick-borne encephalitis. Novosibirsk: State. med. Academy of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. 2001: 360 (in Russian).

3. Scripcenco N.V. Tick-borne encephalitis in children: diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Terra Medica Nova. 2010; 1: 5 – 11 (in Russian).

4. State report «On the state sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in 2013» (in Russian).

5. Immunization – 2014 (reference). 12 ed. Eds.: V.K.Tatochenko. N.A. Ozeretskovsky, A.M. Fedorov. Pediatrician. Moscow. 2014: 280 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Kharit S.M., Ruleva A.A., Fridman I.V., Nacharova E.P., Alekseeva L.A., Vasil'eva G.A., Vilnic A.A., Ivanova M.V. The results of an Open, Randomized Comparative Clinical Study to Assess the Reactogenicity, Safety and Immunogenicity of the Vaccine EntseVir in Children Aged 3 to 17 Years. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2015;14(2):66-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2015-14-2-66-72

Views: 830


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2073-3046 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0494 (Online)