Manifestations of the Epidemic Process of Measles and Rubella at the Present Stage
https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-45-53
Abstract
Relevance. Measles and rubella have been known to humanity for centuries. These two infections have a number of similarities. However, despite all the similarities and a single elimination program, it is not possible to achieve the same results by the level of the incidence of these infections. Goal. Identify common features and differences in the manifestations of the epidemic process of measles and rubella at the present stage and formulate a hypothesis on their explanation.
Materials and methods. Methods of retrospective epidemiological analysis of morbidity were used: Evaluation of the statistical significance of the differences in indicators with the Student’s test. To compare the rate of decrease in the incidence of measles and rubella their exponential approximations using the method of least squares were used. To process the research data, the Microsoft Excel program was used.
Results. In the pre-vaccination period, the incidence of measles was 4.6 times higher than rubella. For major infections in this period characterized by a pronounced cyclic morbidity, while the intervals between cyclical rises for measles are shorter, and the amplitude of cycles is higher. As the population was vaccinated, the incidence of these infections decreased, while the rate of decline in the incidence of rubella was higher than that of measles. Also, a faster decrease in morbidity and smoothing of the cyclicity, a transition to older age groups, a gradual exit from the incidence of younger age groups confirm that the rubella has a contact number less then measles.
Conclusion. The current level of population immunity is sufficient to eliminate rubella in a relatively short time. For measles, which has greater contagiousness and a contact number, and is more demanding for population immunity, this level is not enough. As a consequence, rubella shows better «manageability» in immunization than measles.
About the Authors
A. A. PozdnyakovRussian Federation
Artem A. Pozdnyakov – senior lecturer of the Department of Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine
O. P. Chernyavskaya
Russian Federation
Olga P. Chernyavskaya – Cand. Sci. (Med), associate professor of the Department of Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine
References
1. Measles in Russia: the problem of elimination. Ed.: GGOnishchenko, AYu Popova, VA, Aleshkin, Moscow. Publishing House «Dynasty», 2017: 552.
2. Aleshkin VA, Tikhonova NT, Gerasimova AG, Tsvirkun OV, Shulga SV, Yezhlova EB, et al. Problems on the way to achieve measles elimination in the Russian Federation. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2016; (5): 29–34.
3. Kostinov MP., Shmitko AD, Solovieva IL, Savisko AA, Polishchuk VB Ryzhov AA, et al. Is a third dose of measles vaccine required – an opinion of an immunologist. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2016; 5: 88–94.
4. Popov VF. Measles and measles vaccine. The Triad-X. 2002.
5. Tsvirkun OV, Gerasimova AG, Sadykova DK. The role of a unified system of surveillance for measles and rubella in the period of measles elimination. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2003; 2: 16–17.
6. Tsvirkun OV, Lytkina IV, Ezhlova EB, Tikhonova NT, Gerasimova AG, Turaeva NV. Effect of specific measles prophylaxis on the level and structure of annual incidence in the Russian Federation. Infectious diseases. 2011; 9 (1): 23–27.
7. Tsvirkun OV, Gerasimova AG, Tikhonova NT, Turaeva NV, Pimenova AS. Structure of measles cases during elimination. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2012; 2 (63): 21–26.
8. Rubella: epidemiology, laboratory diagnostics and prevention in sporadic conditions. Analytical review. NIIEM them. Pasteur. 2010: 68.
9. Bolotovsky VM, Mikheeva IV, Lytkina IN, Shakhanina IL Measles, rubella, epidemic parotitis: a unified system for managing epidemic processes. Moscow; 2004: 224.
10. Otvagin SA, Briko NI/ Comparative characteristics of the incidence of scarlet fever, chickenpox, rubella, measles, whooping cough, epidemic parotitis of the population of Moscow in recent years. Epidemiology and infectious diseases. 2005; 6: 13–16.
11. Toptygina, AP/ General regularities of the formation and maintenance of a specific humoral immune response by the example of a response to measles and rubella viruses. Infection and immunity. 2014; 4 (1): 7–14.
12. Toptygina AP, Aleshkin VA/ Comparison of the primary and secondary humoral immune response to the vaccination of «Prioriks». Infection and immunity. 2013; 3 (4): 359–364.
13. Brio NI, Zueva LP, Pokrovsky VI, Sergiev VP, Shkarin VV/ Epidemiology: A Textbook in 2 volumes. Moscow. MIC. 2013.
14. Infectious diseases and epidemiology: a textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow. GEOTAR-Media. 2009: 816.
15. Gerasimov AN, Razhevaikin VN. Dynamics of the epidemic process in a heterogeneous, not completely isolated population, taking into account seasonal fluctuations in the activity of the transmission mechanism. Journal of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. 2008; 48 (8): 1488–1499.
Review
For citations:
Pozdnyakov A.A., Chernyavskaya O.P. Manifestations of the Epidemic Process of Measles and Rubella at the Present Stage. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2018;17(5):45-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-5-45-53