Epidemic Risk of Brucellosis in Modern conditions
https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2016-15-3-15-22
Abstract
Under present conditions there is a high risk of an epidemic of brucellosis associated with the threat of the spread of the pathogen from many natural sources, as well as artificially as a result of bioterrorist actions. In spite of the vast complex of brucellosis eradication activities around the world, it still remains endemic in many regions of the world. The situation is exacerbated by the ecological spreading of the causative agent of brucellosis on the previously unusual species of natural hosts, accompanied by the emergence of new Brucella species, some of which poses a risk to humans. This paper summarizes the data on the distribution area of human pathogenic Brucella species, structure and level of incidence of brucellosis in different regions of our country and abroad, pathogenicity of representatives of different species and biotypes of Brucella for humans.
Keywords
бруцеллез,
вид,
биотип,
патогенность,
заболеваемость,
биотерроризм,
brucellosis,
species,
biotype,
pathogenicity,
morbidity,
bioterrorism
About the Authors
V. Yu. Okhapkina
Branch of the Federal state establishment «48 Central Research and Development Institute» Russian Federation Ministry of Defense
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. V. Pyatkova
Branch of the Federal state establishment «48 Central Research and Development Institute» Russian Federation Ministry of Defense
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. L. Pavlov
Branch of the Federal state establishment «48 Central Research and Development Institute» Russian Federation Ministry of Defense
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Susloparov
Branch of the Federal state establishment «48 Central Research and Development Institute» Russian Federation Ministry of Defense
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Hurtado R. Brucellosis – new and old issues regarding diagnosis and management Harvard education online. 2001. Available at: http:///www.mgh.harvard. edu/id/images/brucellosis.pdf
2. CBRNE – Brucellosis. E - Medicine Journal; 2001; 2: 10.
3. Pappas G., Akritidis N., Bosilkovski M., Tsianos E. Brucellosis. The New Ingland Journal of Medicine; 2005; 352: 2325 – 2336.
4. Doyle T.J., Bryan R.T. Infectious diseases morbidity in the U.S. region bordering Mexico 1990-1998; J. Infect. Dis.; 2000: 182 (5): 1503 – 1510.
5. Corbel M.J. Brucellosis in humans and animals; WHO, 2006: 89.
6. Lopes L.B., Nicolino R., Haddad J.P.A. Brucellosis – risk factors and prevalence: A Review. The Open Veterinary Science Journal. 2010; 4: 72 – 84.
7. Young E.J. An overview of human brucellosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1995; 2: 283 – 290.
8. Abdou A.E. Fifty years of veterinary public health activities in the Eastern Mediterranean Regionu. East Mediter Health J. 2000; 6: 796 – 807.
9. Brucellosis. Griffith’s 5 minute Clinical Consult – A reference for Clinicians. Ed. Mark R. Dambro. HealthCyberMap.org. 200; 9 th Ed.: 1 – 5.
10. Memish Z. Brucellosis in laboratory workers at Saudi Arabian hospital. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2001; 29 (1): 48 –52.
11. Arai G.F. Human brucellosis: a classical infectious disease with persistent diagnostic challenges. Clinical Laboratory Science. 1999; 12 (4): 207 – 212.
12. Izadi S. Neurobrucellosis. Shiraz E Medical Journal. 2001; 2 (1): 2 – 6.
13. Onischenko G.G. Epidemiological situation to the Russian Federation and the main activities on its stabilization. Materialyi VIII Vserosciyskogo s›ezda epidemiologov, mikrobiologov i parazitologov. Moscow; 2002: 3 – 7 (in Russian).
14. In Kyrgyzstan incidence of a brucellosis continues to be reduced. K-NEW, 2014. Available at: www.knews.kg/society/442222v_kyirgyizstan (in Russian).
15. Infectious morbidity in the Rospotrebnadzor. Available at: http://www.rospotrebnadzor.ru (in Russian).
16. Lyamkin G.I., Tihenko N.I., Manin E.A., Rusanova D.V., Golovneva S.I., Vilinskaya S.V. et al. About an epidemic situation of incidence of a brucellosis in the Russian Federation in 2011 and the forecast for 2012. Problems of especially dangerous infections. 2012; 1: 27 – 29 (in Russian).
17. Lyamkin G.I., Manin E.A., Golovneva S.I., Tihenko N.I., Kulichenko A.N. Epidemiological situation on a brucellosis in the Russian Federation in 2012 and the forecast for 2013. Problems of especially dangerous infections.. 2013; 1: 21 – 24 (in Russian).
18. Lyamkin G.I., Golovneva S.I., Hudoleev A.A., Chebotareva E.N., Shakirova L.I., Kulichenko A.N The review of an epizootic and epidemiological situation on a brucellosis in the Russian Federation in 2013 and the forecast for 2014. Problems of especially dangerous infections. 2014; 2: 29 – 32 (in Russian).
19. Zheludkov M.M. Brucellosis in Russia: modern epidemiology and laboratory diagnostics: PhD of med. sci. diss. Moscow. 2009: 263 (in Russian).
20. In Russia an unstable epidemic situation on a brucellosis. Infoagency «IMIT», 27.09.2011. Available at: www.emeat.ru/new.php?id=47553 (in Russian).
21. 40 percent of the registered brucellosis cases in Russia are the share of Dagestan. RIA Dagestan, 2011. Available at: http://www.riadagestan.ru/news/2011/11/26/121619 (in Russian).
22. To Stavropol Territory get sick with a brucellosis of 70 people in a year. Infoagency StavropolInfo, 27.09.2011. Available at: http:/stavinform.ru/ru/health/94/403 (in Russian).
23. Available at: www.proctuva.ru/news.php (in Russian)
24. Epidemiological surveillance behind a brucellosis and the organization of anti-epidemic actions in the Volgograd region. Press release Available at: http://34.rospotrebnadzor.ru/press/release/71465 (in Russian).
25. In Orenburg region note an unsuccessful situation on a brucellosis. Info agency Regnum, 2011. Available at: http://www.regnum.ru/news/medicine/1484066.html (in Russian).
26. In Zabaykalsk the area the outbreak of a brucellosis is registered. RIA Vesti Ru, 28.12.2011. Available at: www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=673361 (in Russian).
27. Banai M., Corbel M. Taxonomy of Brucella. The Open Veterinary Science Journal. 2010; 4: 85 – 101.
28. Vershilova P.A., Golubeva A.A. Brucellosis in the USSR and a way of its prevention. Moscow: Medicine; 1970: 191 (in Russian).
29. Foster G., Osterman B.S., Godfroid J. et al. Brucella ceti sp. nov. and Brucella pinnipedialis sp. nov. for Brucella strains with cetaceans and seals as their preferred hosts. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007; 57: 2688 – 2693.
30. Scholz H.C., Hubalek Z., Sedlǎĉek I. et al. Brucella microti sp. nov., isolaited from the common vole Microtus arvalis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008; 58: 375-382.
31. Scholz, Nőcler K., Gőllner C. H.C. Brucella inopinata sp. nov., isolaited from a breast implant infection. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010; 60 (4): 801-808.
32. Vershilova P.A. Brucellosis. Moscow: Medicine; 1972: 439 (in Russian).
33. Brew S.D., Perrett L.L., Stack J.A. et al. Human exposure to Brucella recovered from a sea mammal. Vet. Rec. 1999; 144(17): 483.
34. Zdrodovskiy P.F. Brucellosis. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo meditsinskoy literaturyi; 1953: 244 (in Russian).
35. Vershilova P.A., Kaytmazova E.I., Ostrovskaya N.N. The generalized materials on studying of brucellas emitted in the Soviet Union. Mikrob. 1967; 7: 82 (in Russian).
36. Heineman H.S., Dziamski J.M. Brucella suis infection in Phiadelphia. A survey of hot fever and asymptomatic brucellosis. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1976; 103 (1): 88 – 100.
37. Lyamkin G.I., Taran I.F., Schedrin V.I. Modern ideas of a brucellosis as natural and focal disease. Zhurn. mikrobiol. 1995; 2: 115 – 118 (in Russian).
38. Taran I.F., Ryibasov N.A. About possible ways of distribution and evolution of brucellas. Zhurn. mikrobiol. 1971; 5: 34 – 38 (in Russian).
39. Kaytmazova E.I., Ostrovskaya N.N. To a question of the characteristic of the brucellas allocated for territories of the USSR: Message of I. Zhurn. mikrobiol. 1967; 1: 12 – 16 (in Russian).
40. Kaytmazova E.I., Ostrovskaya N.N. To a question of the characteristic of the brucellas allocated for territories of the USSR: Message of II. Zhurn. mikrobiol. 1967; 2: 66 – 70 (in Russian).
41. Kalinovskiy A.I., Repina L.P., Mihaylov L.M. Assessment of modern epidemiological value of the centers of a brucellosis of different types of the East Siberian region. Saratov; 1997: 55 (in Russian).
42. Zheludkov M.M., Tolmacheva T.A., Efimov M.A. Diagnosis of a brucellosis in system of an epidnadzor. Saratov; 1998: 171 – 173 (in Russian).
43. Egorova L.S. To a question of the epidemiological importance of various B.abortus biotypes in Western Siberia. Materialyi mezhinstitutskoy konferentsii po brutsellezu. Moscow; 1971: 6 – 8 (in Russian).
44. Uzbekova B.R., Kondrateva O.V., Varshavskaya B.L. The characteristic of brucellas and epidemiological value of various B.abortus biotypes allocated in Kazakhstan. Moscow; 1971: 8 – 11(in Russian).
45. Gudoshnik A.N., Bikmulina F.M., Shtuchnaya A.A. To the bacteriological and epidemiological characteristic of the centers of a bovin brucellosis. Moscow; 1971: 11 – 13 (in Russian).
46. Pinigin P.F., Petuhova O.S., Merinov S.P. To taxonomical position of the brucellas allocated from reindeers. Zhurn. mikrobiol. 1986; 6: 98 – 102 (in Russian).
47. Luna Sanchez A., Rodrigues de Cepeda A., Suarez Morano T. Analysis of a disease outbreak оf brucellosis in slaughterhouse workers. Rev. Exp. Saind. Publica. 1998; 72 (2): 137 – 146.
48. Yagupsky P., Peled N., Riesenberg K. et al. Exposure of hospital personnell to Brucella melitensis and occurence of laboratory acquired disease in an endemic area. J. Infect. Dis. 2000; 32 (1): 31 – 35.
49. Palandus A., Palandus S., Guler K. et al. Brucellosis in a mother and her young infant: probable transmission by breast milk. J. Infect. Dis. 2000; 4 (1): 55 – 56.
50. Mantur B.G., Mangalgi S.S., Mulimani B. Brucella melitensis – a sexually transmissible agent. Lancet. 1996; 347: 1763.
51. Ertem M., Kurekci A.E., Ausev D. et al. Brucellosis transmitted by bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 26 (2): 22 – 25.
52. Gapochka K.G., Ogarkov V.I. Experimental reproduction of an aerogenic infection (review). Zhurn. mikrobiol. 1972; 11: 84 – 92 (in Russian).
53. Onischenko G.G., Sandahchiev L.S., Netesov S.V., Martyinyuk R.A. Bioterrorism: national and global threat. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences.2003; 73 (3): 195 – 204 (in Russian).
54. Vasilev N.T., Tarasov M.Yu., Poklonskiy D.L. Biological terrorism: past and future. Hemical and Biological Safety. 2002; 6: 3 – 10 (in Russian).
55. Supotnitsky M.V. Biological warfare. Introduction to epidemiology of artificial epidemic processes and biological defeats: monography. Moscow; Kafedra, «Russian panoram»; 2013: 1136 (in Russian).
56. Center For Disease Control and Prevention. Biological and chemical terrorism: Strategic plan for preparedness and response. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2000; 49 (RR-4):1 – 14.
57. Kaufman A.F., Meltser M.I., Shmid Dzh.P. Economic value of bioterrorist attack: whether implementation of the program of measures of prevention and elimination of consequences is justified. Weapons and military equipment. 1997; 2: 32 (in Russian).
58. Suspected Brucellosis Case Prompts Investigation of Possible Bioterrorism-Related Activity-New Hampshire and Massachusetts. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1999; 49 (23): 509 – 512.
59. Golovchenko N.N., Korotkin L.M. Anti-epidemic actions at elimination of consequences of a bioact of terrorism. Moscow; 2003. Available at: Journal@bio.su (in Russian).
60. Stringer K. Biological Weapons and agricultural Terrorism. 1998: 92-94.
Review
For citations:
Okhapkina V.Yu., Pyatkova N.V., Pavlov D.L., Susloparov A.A. Epidemic Risk of Brucellosis in Modern conditions. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2016;15(3):15-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2016-15-3-15-22
Views:
1192
Email this article 